|
You Are Being Watched spotlights the high costs of camera surveillance systems, both in terms of money and civil liberties. Do we want a society where we live under an ever-watchful video eye?
|
      
|
| |
| |
Home > About the Issue > Reports and Studies
- CITRIS Evaluation of the SF Community Safety Camera Program, An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of San Francisco's Community Safety Cameras (December 2008)
- ACLU Technology and Liberty Program, Expert Findings on Surveillance Cameras: What Criminologists and Others Studying Cameras Have Found (June 2008)
- University of California-Berkeley, Preliminary Findings of the Statistical Evaluation of the Crime-Deterrent Effects of the San Francisco Crime Camera Program (March 2008)
- The Constitution Project, Guidelines for Public Video Surveillance (2007)
- ACLU California Affiliates, Under the Watchful Eye: The Proliferation of Video Surveillance Systems in California (August 2007)
- American Civil Liberties Union, Surveillance Cameras and the Attempted London Attacks (July 2007)
- New York Civil Liberties Union, Who's Watching? Video Camera Surveillance in New York City and the Need for Public Oversight (Fall 2006)
- California Research Bureau, Public and Private Applications of Video Surveillance and Biometric Technologies (February 2006)
- UK Home Office, Home Office Research Study 292: Assessing the Impact of CCTV (2005)
- United States General Accounting Office, Video Surveillance: Information on Law Enforcement’s Use of Closed-Circuit Television to Monitor Selected Federal Property in Washington, D.C. (June 2003)
- American Civil Liberties Union, The Four Problems With Public Video Surveillance (May 2003)
- Marc Roessler, How to find hidden cameras, (March 2002)
- U.S. Department of Justice, The Appropriate and Effective Use of Security Technologies in U.S. Schools (September 1999)
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
